Jackie Dugard

SACSIS: Constitutional Water Rights Judgment Gets It Wrong

| | | |

Constitutional Water Rights Judgment Gets It Wrong

Date posted: 21 October 2009
View this article online here: http://www.sacsis.org.za/site/article/373.1

On 08 October 2009, the Constitutional Court handed down its first water rights judgment. The case – Mazibuko & Others v City of Johannesburg & Others – was brought by five impoverished residents in Phiri, Soweto, on behalf of themselves, all similarly-situated residents and everyone in the public interest. The applicants challenged the City’s free basic water policy for being insufficient to meet the basic needs of large, poor, multi-dwelling households. They also challenged the lawfulness of prepayment water meters, which had been installed against their will and result in automatic cut-off of the water supply following the exhaustion of the free basic water supply unless additional water credit is purchased.

Business Day: Why Cape legal twist looks like a demolition of justice for poor

| | | | |

http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=74686

Why Cape legal twist looks like a demolition of justice for poor
JACKIE DUGARD and KATE TISSINGTON
Published: 2009/07/02 07:11:59 AM

IN MAY, backyard shack-dwellers with no access to formal housing took their case against the City of Cape Town to the Western Cape High Court. They were represented by the law firm, Smith Tabata Buchanan Boyes, which took on the case at a substantially reduced rate at the request of the South African Council of Churches (SACC).

Syndicate content