Category Archives: censorship

Radio Grahamstown Station Manager Shuts Down Debate

Saturday, 29 June 2013
Unemployed People’s Movement Press Statement

Radio Grahamstown Station Manager Shuts Down Debate

There is a big political problem developing in Grahamstown. The new RDP houses in Extension Ten are being allocated. People who were on the waiting list for years, including activists who have been struggling for decent housing, have been removed from the list without any explanation. At the same time friends of the councillors and people who are connected to them through the ruling party have suddenly been added to the list.

This issue was discussed on Radio Grahamstown on Wednesday last week (26 June 2013). Three members of the Unemployed People’s Movement where invited as studio guests to discuss this matter. People were very vocal. There were lots of calls coming through. With the exception of one ANC caller who said that the Unemployed People’s Movement was being used by whites to undermine the ANC all the other callers were strongly supportive of the work that we are doing on the Extension Ten housing scandal.

Suddenly the station manager barged into the studio, banged the doors, shouted at everyone and kicked the DJ and his three guests out. Callers and people listening to the programme on air could hear her shouting!

The DJ who was kicked out of the studio live on air is a member of the Right2Know Campaign. It is incredible that we are being so openly prevented from discussing this important matter on a local radio station.

Later on the same night an Abahlali baseMjondolo member, Nkululeko Gwala, was assassinated in Durban. He had been raising exactly the same issues about houses going to people close to the councillors.

Democracy is becoming a joke under Jacob Zuma.

We are calling for a full investigation into this incident on Radio Grahamstown and a full investigation into political corruption in the allocation of the houses in Extension Ten. We also send our full support to our comrades in Abahlali baseMjondolo in Durban. This is the third member of their organisation to be murdered in Durban this year.

Xola Mali 072 299 5253

Abahlali baseMjondolo Takes the Minister of Police to Court to Account for Police Repression in Durban

4 December 2012
Abahlali baseMjondolo Press Statement

Abahlali baseMjondolo Takes the Minister of Police to Court to Account for Police Repression in Durban

On the 12th of September 2006 S'bu Zikode and Philani Zungu, then the chairperson and deputy chairperson of Abahlali baseMjondolo, were arrested on their way to a radio interview and subject to severe assault in the Sydenham Police Station. When people in the nearby Kennedy Road shack settlement rallied in support of Zikode and Zungu they were attacked by the police and Nondumiso Mke was shot in her knee with live ammunition. The arrest and assault from police at the hands of the police was highly politicised and followed intimidation from senior politicians that including a warning that the movement must stop its communication with the media. For background to this see the statement online at http://abahlali.org//////node/72

Continue reading

UPM: ‘This Bill is Burying us Alive’

3 February 2012
Unemployed People’s Movement Press Statement

‘This Bill is Burying us Alive’

Report on the Public Hearings on the Secrecy Bill in Port Elizabeth

Today’s copy of The Herald newspaper has a big picture on the front page of UPM activist Ma Gladys Mphepho of Grahamstown expressing her anger at the Secrecy Bill. She is quoted as follows:

‘This bill is burying us alive. You have never told us about this bill. We are not stupid, we are senior citizens even if we don’t have money. Don’t treat us like fools. You are giving tenders to your friends and our children go hungry and you want to hide that corruption with this Bill. Do you want us to go back to de Klerk?’

Yesterday’s hearings in Port Elizabeth were conducted in a way that was aimed as suppressing criticism rather than allowing open discussion. The Chairperson of the hearing Johannes Tau told that people that this is the Bill and that we must just accept it. He said that the government is trying to protect us against foreign spies and imperialism. He said that spies could topple Zuma.

We are oppressed by councillors, party structures and the police everyday. We have never been oppressed by a foreign spy. No foreign spy has forced us to use buckets instead of toilets, to live in shacks instead of houses or to live for years and years without work. No foreign spy has broken up our meetings or banned us or arrested us, beaten us or banned us from engaging in political activities for months while we are on bail on charges that are later dropped. The government is trying to invent foreign enemies to try and win back the confidence of the people. Even Mkhuseli Jack, a very high ranking person in the ANC, bravely said “I am concerned that all these threats of possible national dangers are tantamount to creating scapegoats.” And we all know that if Zuma is toppled it will be by Malema and Sexwale and not by foreign spies. The ANC can’t make their internal fights a problem for the whole country.

The chairperson could not provide a real explanation as to why we need this bill.

He was also very intolerant. He would not allow people to speak if they could not quote a section of the Bill even though no copies of the Bill were provided. He tried to force all discussion of the Bill onto the technocratic terrain where experts are strong and ordinary people are weak when in fact everybody knows that democracy is supposed to be the rule of the people and not the rule of the experts. If you mentioned unemployment or poverty they would just cut you. They would just turn off your microphone. If there are public hearings then the public must be given a space to express ourselves.

When people could speak they were very clear that the issues that were important were poverty, housing, unemployment and corruption and that the government should be focussing on these issues. Some people also said that this Bill is trying to make sure that the ANC will rule until Jesus Christ come back and that they are preparing themselves to defeat opposition – in the streets or at the ballot box. ANC stalwart Phila Nkayi who works in the provincial legislature said that these issues must be discussed and he directly opposed the chairperson’s view that these issues have no relevance.

The chairperson said that everywhere else in the province the Bill was given the thumbs-up. If that’s true it would not be surprising in light of the behaviour of the chairperson.

People also really stressed that they have no confidence in the police whatsoever. They stressed that the police are part of the state and work closely with party structures. They stressed that the police that we are now supposed to take information about corruption too are the same police that are killing and beating people who are protesting. Therefore there has to be a public interest clause for making information public. The police are not neutral or independent and the idea that people must take information to the police is ridiculous and was rejected with the contempt that it deserves.

If this Bill is passed into law we are prepared to work with all other poor people’s movements to occupy the streets and to take this Bill to the Constitutional Court.

The absence of COSATU in the hearings was disappointing. In Durban at COP 17 they said that they were with the protesters but then they took over the protest and made it pro-government. We will prefer to work with other poor people’s movements in this struggle as it is clear that COSATU cannot be trusted.

There is a real crisis of growing poverty and inequality in South Africa and there are two choices as to how to resolve it. The state can either become more authoritarian and try to contain the aspirations of the people with brute force and propaganda or it can become more democratic and encourage people to debate, organise and mobilise so that society, including the economy, can be democratised from below. The ANC are taking the path of making society more authoritarian and we will oppose this in every way that we can where ever and when ever we can. As they try to criminalise poverty and dissent and to pretend that legitimate dissent is just about making ‘service delivery’ happen more quickly we will try to politicise poverty, repression and dissent.

Pammy Isaac 084 781 5832
Ayanda Kota 078 625 6462
Ben Mafani 078 087 5177

UPM: Statement on the ‘Secrecy Bill’

1 February 2012
Unemployed People’s Movement

Statement to the National Council of Provinces Hearing on the Secrecy Bill 2 February 2012 Port Elizabeth

As the Unemployed People’s Movement we reject all provisions in this bill which will hinder the free flow of information.

We are clear that this bill will compromise our democracy in important ways. Democracy means the free and open participation of all people in the life of the country. Any attempt to privatise access to information or to intimidate people from sharing information is inherently anti-democratic.

We have asked ourselves why this Bill has come at this point. There is no evidence that the state is under threat from foreign intelligence agencies. The claims that are often made about the rebellion of the poor, and the poor people’s movements that have emerged from this rebellion, being controlled by foreign governments are baseless. People are rebelling because they have no jobs, no houses and no future. People are rebelling because they have been lied to and betrayed.

In our view the real reason why the Bill has come at this point is because (1) the government has realised that popular protest will continue to develop and (2) the media will continue to expose the rampant corruption that began with the arms deal and has most recently resulted in the wholesale plunder of Limpopo. The government is moving to protect itself against dissent and debate by militarising the police, repressing poor people’s movements and clamping down on media freedom and the free flow of information.

We all know that almost twenty years in to democracy it is clear that the current version of democracy has failed most of the people. But the solution to this is to deepen democracy rather than to weaken it.

Instead of censoring and intimidating the media that currently exists we need to diversify the media and create proper support for independent and diverse community controlled media.

Instead of allowing officials to keep important matters secret we need legislation to enhance openness.

Instead of allowing party politics to become corrupted and dominated by the interests of big money we need to stop private and secret funding for political parties.

Instead of thinking that democracy means voting every few years we need to democratise schools, work places and communities. Democracy must be an everyday part of our lives and not something that only happens at elections.

The Secrecy Bill, like the proposed media tribunal, like the militarising of policing and like the politicisation of the intelligence agencies is a serious threat to our democracy. We wish to place on record our complete rejection of the bill.

We also wish to note that while the ANC has been elected to power its violent intolerance towards popular dissent has been well documented. The repression of movements like Abahlali baseMjondolo and the Landless People’s Movement by the ANC has been well documented. The gross misuse of the criminal justice system to repress these movements has also been noted. We too have suffered repression including violence at the hands of the police and the misuse of the criminal justice system for political ends. The ANC has been elected but this does not mean that it is a democratic organisation. It cannot claim that because it has been elected everything that it does is therefore democratic. In fact the real measure of whether or not a government is really is democratic is whether or not it gives the people freedom to criticise it and to organise against it.

The government can’t forever claim that everything that it does is democratic because there are elections. The arrest of Mzilikazi wa Afrika and the murder of Andries Tatane have taken the hidden culture of repression into the light. When the Western Cape Anti-Eviction was repressed in 2000 and the Landless People’s Movement activists were tortured in 2004 it happened in secret. But these days repression is happening in public and on TV. The truth is now there for everyone to see.The days when some people could be blind to state repression have passed.

We do not accept the argument that is being made which states that because other countries, like the USA, have repressive laws we to should have these laws. Since when was the USA, the most violent and ruthless imperialist power in the world today, the standard for our democracy? The USA has attacked democratic movements and governments around the world for years and years. Since when did we allow oppressors to set the standard for what counts as democracy? This argument is disgraceful.

We call on the members of the National Council of Provinces to break ranks with their party bosses and to, instead, declare their solidarity with the people of South Africa and to reject this bill in its entirety.

If this bill is passed we will support mass action against it and in support of democracy as well as an appeal to the Constitutional Court to have it declared unconstitutional.

Pammy Isaac 084 781 5832
Ayanda Kota 078 625 6462
Ben Mafani 078 087 5177

Whose freedom? South Africa’s press, middle-class bias and the threat of control

Whose freedom? South Africa’s press, middle-class bias and the threat of
control

Steven Friedman

Threats to the autonomy of South Africa’s press have prompted protest – understandably so. But, while media control or censorship are inimical to the free flow of information, which is essential to democracy, the mainstream press’s response to real and perceived threats has done more to reveal the depth of its middle-class bias than to rally citizens behind the defence of freedom. The article seeks to demonstrate that the mainstream media’s understanding of freedom is restricted to the liberties of the suburban middle classes. It supports this argument by analysing both the journalistic preoccupations it seeks to defend and the phrasing of its attempts to oppose state control. And it argues that the framing of press freedom as a purely middle-class concern will make it increasingly unlikely that free expression can be effectively defended.

Click here to download this article in pdf.