Category Archives: Black Looks

Urgency is now required in Uganda

http://www.blacklooks.org/2010/02/urgency-is-now-required-in-uganda.html

Urgency is now required in Uganda

by Sokari on February 23, 2010

In April 1994, Rwandan radio broadcast daily programmes calling on all Hutus to kill the Tutsis. The broadcasts went like this….

“Why do we hate the Tutsis? They are cockroaches…Rwanda is Hutuland. We are the majority. Tutsis are the minority. Hutus must kill all the Tutsis…Stay alert – watch your neighbours.”

In a chilling reminder of those broadcasts, yesterday Rainbow Uganda reported that two Ugandan radio stations had called on Ugandans to kill or attack any known Gay person.

Smart & NBS FM Radio Station in Uganda, has called up all Ugandans wherever they are to stand up a fight, kill or attack any known Gay person in the Country. ….. Please this is not good! It can even cause genocide

If we stand back and reflect on the past three / four years of the Ugandan Anti-homosexuality and Transgender campaign and in particular these past six months, we should not be surprised that we have now reached this point. Only last week, demonstrators marched through the streets carrying “Kill Gays” placards. Starting from 2005 – not the beginning but a good place to start. First there was the illegal raid of Victor Mukasa’s home in July 2005 following which he choose to sue the Ugandan Attorney General and subsequently spent almost a year in fear of his life and in hiding. He and Kenyan activist, Yvonne Oyoo finally won their case which took almost 3 years of sheer perseverance on the part of Victor and his supporters. In September 2007 and again in April 2009 the Ugandan tabloid, Red Pepper, published the names of gays and lesbians. In the April publication a number of Ugandan LGBT activists were also named including Victor Mukasa, Frank Mugisha and Kasha Jacqueline whose interview I published yesterday. In November 2007, a group of Ugandan LGBTI activists were evicted from the “People’s Forum” and later other activists from East Africa were physically prevented from entering the forum.

During the same period a film discussing homosexuality made by a Ugandan film company, Amakula was screened and anti-gay religious leaders held a press conference calling on the Commonwealth

“to not legislate for human wrongs. Homosexuality is an evil, which should never be discussed during Chogm. In Chogm meetings, we should advocate for them to change because the act is unnatural,” Bishop Niringiye said……The issue of rights of gays and lesbians was one of the recommendations in the Civil Society Statement to the Commonwealth Heads of State Meeting……Bishop Niringire said, “As a church, we are telling Commonwealth heads of governments to formulate value systems to solve the question of lesbianism and homosexuality being a human right.”

Again there the warnings were present but the silence remained.

In September 2008 two activists were arrested, tortured and held for one week without legal representation and later re-arrested. Last year, one of the arrested turned on his friends naming and denouncing them and claiming he was no longer gay. The placards at the time called for gays to be “kicked out of Uganda”. By this time many members of SMUG and other LGBTI activists were fleeing the country fearing for their lives. At the end of that post, I wrote

The Ugandan government is currently considering legislation that may increase already extreme criminal penalties for consensual homosexual relationships and make LGBT organizing and “recruitment,” whatever that might be, illegal.

In October last year, the Ugandan Parliament passed a resolution allowing David Bahati to submit a private member’s bill for the purposes of

“strengthening the nation’s capacity to deal with emerging internal and external threats to the traditional heterosexual family”, that “same sex attraction is not an innate and immutable characteristic”, and “protect[ing] the cherished culture of the people of Uganda, legal, religious, and traditional family values of the people of Uganda against the attempts of sexual rights activists seeking to impose their values of sexual promiscuity on the people of Uganda”

In the past six months the campaign has become more hateful and increasingly violent in tone and actions as yhe religious supporters of the Bill, both in Uganda and in the US become more and more brazen. There will become a point of critical mass when they no longer need to speak as they have willfully set in motion the killing spree.

The point of of the above trajectory is not to say that the radio broadcasts were inevitable – I dont think they were. But it is to place the calls to kill LGBTI people in a historical context, one that with hindsight could lead in that direction. But more so to state that we need to heed the warnings and put an end to the relative silence before people are murdered. Despite the considerable high profile the Bill has received in the mainstream media and blogosphere, there has been negligible response from human rights organisations or governments. African countries have been silent. Academia has been silent. So called African feminists and women’s organisations have been deafeningly silent. Only last week I was at a workshop in Accra when women expressed fear of claiming feminism in case they would be labeled the dreaded L-word – but where satisfied when reassured that the two could be mutually exclusive. Religious institutions have not been silent. On the contrary as unbelievable as it is to imagine religious institutions leading a hate campaign and inciting violence – it is they who lead the campaign.

As early as 2007, IGLHRC reported on the link between US evangelical churches and the growing homophobia in Uganda. Again in December last year I wrote two posts – here and here – on the US Christian connection. In fact the only group that have made a statement are the Abahlali Shackdwellers movement in Durban who themselves are under attack from the South African state.

Are all the people that make up these groups and institutions going to remain silent while Ugandan citizens are killed because of their sexuality and sexual preferences? Will they then sit by when the same thing happens in Malawi, Senegal, Kenya and Nigeria? At what point will they begin to see a pattern called genocide is taking place? How easy is it for people to consume this inhumanity? A post on World Pulse last week suggested that “Homosexuality is the new Apartheid: Silence is a global consensus” and points out the need to “elevate the debate to one of personal experience.

The basis of the human rights declaration is that contempt for our rights should not result in barbarous acts which outrage the conscience of mankind. There is far too much evidence of such acts already, so why actively allow more to be perpetrated under rule of law? How are we to evolve and progress society, if fear and obstruction is allowed commonplace. If homosexuality is the new apartheid – the absolute degradation of a part of society, the clear and conspicuous ostracizing of people based on sexual orientation. Its almost absurd to imagine this could be common place, yet it is. Even across America, a democratic society, voters have the right to oust minorities from access to legislation and basic rights under the law i.e. to be legally married, to live a life together to in mere fact – just get on with it.

But there is more than a will to dominate and oppress [see definition of Apartheid] in the hate campaign being conducted in Uganda – one gets the feeling that other countries like Malawi, Kenya are playing a wait and see game, ready to enact their own hideous laws. The campaign has now moved to legislating murder whether through the Bill itself or by inciting people on the streets to out and kill their neighbours. From where I am sitting and what I am feeling and all of us who actually believe in the concept of inclusive rights but particularly those of us who are LGBTIQ people is to quote my friend, Dan “calls for help at best receive tacit, discrete and polite responses, from their so-called allies.” Urgency is now required in Uganda.

Black Looks: Xenophobia deflects government failures

Black Looks

Xenophobia deflects government failures
on May 19, 2008
Category: Poverty, Social Movements, South Africa, Refugees, Africa

My friend Beauty at “Nigeria What’s New” posted on the violence against immigrants taking place in South Africa and wonders

why bloggers in the diaspora are not screaming about this horrible human rights issue since the story broke on May 1st.

Good point, Beauty after all if this was happening in Spain, France, Britain or any where else in Europe we would be screaming. In fact I was screaming the other day about asylum seekers in Britain. Talk to any African foreigners and they will tell you their own experience of xenophobia in South Africa. But these encounters are superficial and hide the truth. What is happening is far more complex than is being presented in the reports as violence and xenophobia. Nonetheless, these very disturbing videos here and here and here, fit well with the one posted from last week on Race Hate in Russia. More importantly the videos tell us how governments with the support of the media can and have used immigration as a way of deflecting people away from the real issues and their failure to meet the valid expectations of the people.

This article in the Times [A simple recipe for xenophobia] points to a number of factors that have no doubt contributed to the violence.

What caused the terrible scenes unfolding in our country today: children beaten and displaced, women raped and men left with pieces of flesh hanging from their faces, homeless and hungry and desperate?

What led to a situation where young men were unashamed to stand in front of television cameras and say they will kill foreigners?

We should not be surprised. For the ANC, led by Zuma and Mbeki, the chickens are coming home to roost………….

These people are behaving like barbarians because the ANC has failed — despite numerous warnings — to act on burning issues that are well known for having sparked similar eruptions across the globe.

But the bulk of the cocktail comprises the failed state that is Zimbabwe. The country’s economy has collapsed. Its political leaders, security services and agents are looting the treasury. Zimbabweans are fleeing.

The writer, as in the last paragraph, still externalises the violence by bringing it back to Zimbabwe and Robert Mugabe. But it is not just Zimbabweans who are victims of the violence – all Africans are – from townships to universities. In fact the statement only fuels the violence against refugees. Yes clearly there is a struggle for scare resources such as food, housing and jobs but this does not explain everything. The truth lies more in the total failure of the post Apartheid government to bring about meaningful social change for the masses with the country largely remaining in an economic time warp of white rule. The violence is an indictment on the government which has engaged in an outright attack on the poor in urban and rural areas which is reminiscent of apartheid and what people see is more hardship not less.

The media and the government are naming the violence as xenophobia but the reality is that people have reached boiling point after 14 years of dashed hopes and have now turned on the most vulnerable in their communities, refugees, and foreigners to vent their frustration. This in no way justifies the violence but does go some way to explain the fragility of the country.

I would add that progressive shack dwellers’ movements, like Abahlali baseMjondolo in Durban, the Anti-Privatisation Forum (APF) which has members in some shack settlements in Jo’burg, as well as the Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign, have always taken a strong position against this violence. Abhalali has always been clear that it welcomes all shack dwellers in to the movement irrespective of where they come from and indeed has hosted men and women from Zimbabwe’s shackdweller communities as well as reached out to the residents as far away as Cite Soleil in Haiti.

It is a tragedy that such attacks are happening in poor working class communities, where the poor are fighting the poor. But there is a clear reason for this. Many in our communities are made to believe that unemployment is caused by foreigners who take jobs in the country – this is simply untrue. Forty percent (40%) of all South African citizens are unemployed and this has been the case for many years. This is not the result of immigrants from other countries coming to South Africa but rather, the result of the anti-poor, profit-seeking policies of the government and the behaviour of the capitalist class. Such massive and sustained unemployment is a structural problem of a capitalist system that cares little about the poor, wherever they are from/live.

Black Looks Blog: Abahlali baseMjondolo

>
http://www.blacklooks.org/2007/03/abahlali_basemjondolo-2.html#more-1416
Picture of System Cele

Listen to an interview with System Cele here.

Abahlali baseMjondolo
on March 23, 2007
Category: South Africa, Social Movements

Whilst in Durban I met with the newly formed Women’s League of the Abahlali baseMjondolo (Shack Dwellers’) Movement which, although it has members across the province of KwaZulu-Natal, has its strongest base firmly concentrated in Durban.

Members of the newly formed Women’s League of the The Abahlali baseMjondolo (Shack Dwellers) Movement based in Durban spoke about their lives and their struggle against eviction, corruption and the right to housing, water and other basic amenities. I found a group of strong women who despite living with domestic violence, unemployment, rape and HIV were determined to stand their ground and in the daily fight against Durban municipalities, councillors and local businessmen for the right to live with dignity. Their biggest problem was unemployment and all desperately wanted to find ways to create their own incomes as paid labour was even more difficult to get than self-employment. Many of the women collected materials for recycling but they wanted to set up their own recycling business such as making glasses out of bottles and consumer products from tins and cans but to do this they need money to buy the special equipment and of course training. They had access to small pieces of land that they could use for vegetable gardens but even though they had been allocated some equipment by the local government they had not received it and did not expect to receive it so the only alternative was to use their hands to work the garden. Some of the women had set up a feeding scheme for the very poor members of their community which worked by those who could afford to give something contributing pap and other food stuffs when they could and sharing the preparation and cooking.

Motala Heights.

The Shack dwellers in Motala Heights settlement (in the nearby industrial town of Pine Town) are 100% Abahlali and were very organised. There is also a very poor Indian community adjacent to the settlement and this group are themselves becoming organised and are working with Abahlali in Motala Heights in one big Abahlali branch the includes the shack settlement and the tiny houses. The situation here is that the shacks were supposed to be upgraded but a local business man, Ricky Govender wants to build housing for middle class Indians. He is now trying to evict the present shack dwellers and people in tin houses (Africans and Indians) so that he can go ahead with his plans to “upgrade the area” and remove the criminals i.e. the poor. It is against the law to evict shack dwellers but with corruption rife, businessman are able to circumvent the law and evictions do take place unless the residents are prepared to stand their ground and fight back. Although it is illegal to evict residents, it is also illegal to build new shacks.

DSC00051.JPG

Forced Evictions

The government is building box houses on the rural periphery of the city to re house the shack dwellers and presenting this as a form of progressive action. The reality is that it is a form of apartheid the only difference being that single women are also allocated housing. People are being forced to move into these small box houses which are being built way out of town far from transport with no schools, clinics or other infrastructure. There is no employment hope in these places so how are people supposed to live? Another issue is that many shacks are shared by more than one family – why so? Because the allocations go to one “family” to one new house. But since shacks house more than one family the one that remains or is not part of the “rehousing scheme” is then made homeless and has to then seek another family to share with and so the cycle continues. Sometimes whole generations of one or two or even three families are sharing the space – it is inhumane and undignified for all. A further issue is that in some cases families are having to pay bribes to get on the rehousing list and then they find even then they are still not allocated housing which adds to the bitterness and hostility towards the local government officials.

DSC00054.JPG
Sibu Zikode is the President of The Abahlali and he is a living expression of the movement. Calm determined, focused and committed. The basis of the success of Abahlali are all these things. Yes they are angry at the betrayal of the post apartheid government, at the dehumanizing of their lives and the trickery of business and local councillors but it is not a wild anger. It is a focused liberating anger.

Sibu lives in the Kennedy Road Settlement which has been in existence for 30 years but still the government insists on calling it a temporary settlement which is a way of denying the people basic services. For example in 2002 the present ANC government stopped electrifying the settlements. There are only 5 toilets and 5 standpipes for a population of some 7000. Denying the community these basic needs is a way of marginalising them as well as attempting to remove them from their homes. They are not moving. The movement to mobilize the whole settlement community started following a series of Marches by the Kennedy Road people and was joined by other surrounding settlements that at the time all had local based organising committees. But it was following the denial of their promised land that led to the formation of The Abahlali starting with 14 settlements and now there are 34 altogether associated with the movement.

The success of the movement is due to the committed collective leadership, the bravery of everyone to defend their rights and the fact that there is a sense of unity and ownership of their community – there are no NGOs, academics or any other group that speaks for the Abahlali – they speak for themselves – elect themselves and struggle for themselves.

The people of Kennedy Road do not want to move to a new location outside the city. There is land next door to them that was promised to them and then sold to a local business man. They want their land to be redeveloped so they have access to schools, health and employment.

The ANC has betrayed the masses of people, the poor, the vulnerable and most needy sections of South African society both in the urban and in the rural areas. HIV and AIDS are lived experiences for everyone in these areas. As someone said to me – we in the townships, the informal settlements, the rural areas all live with HIV – no one has friends, relatives and family who are either positive or who have died of AIDS – it is everywhere sometimes openly sometimes secretly amongst us but it is there and it speaks loudly.

The people of the informal settlements feel betrayed, angry and frustrated by the present leadership after the struggle for liberation but this has made them stronger and more determined. They intend to use the very same tactics and strategies of the anti-apartheid movement to continue and win their own struggle for dignity. Ironically it was the Apartheid government that build the one concrete structure in the Kennedy Road settlement and the concrete steps in the nearby Foreman Road settlement.

The Abahlali baseMjondolo movement is living proof that when the the organized poor start speaking for themselves it creates a serious crisis. No one not the NGOs, the Government or various middle class left sects want the poor to speak for themselves. NGOs overtly and or covertly try by all means to undermine movements of the poor and co-opt the struggle for their own selfish purposes to the point where you find that there is little difference between them and the State itself.

I would like to thank all the activists from the The Abahlali baseMjondolo movement who spoke with me, invited me into their community and shared with me their trust and their struggle and dreams for the future.

Shackdwellers + Durban