Category Archives: third force

M&G: Activists decry talk of ‘third force’ at Marikana

http://mg.co.za/article/2012-08-23-activists-decry-talk-of-third-force-at-marikana/

Activists decry talk of ‘third force’ at Marikana

by Niren Tolsi, Mail & Guardian

The suggestion, presented with a sprinkling of muti, is that the 34 miners would not have been shot dead if some unseen hand had not been at work.

The Marikana dust appeared to have just settled on the bodies of the 34 dead miners last week when the spin machines started whirring out the spectre of a “third force”, whispering of “agents provocateur” and “criminal elements” at work.

The suggestion, presented with a sprinkling of muti, was that the 34 miners would not have been shot dead by police if some unseen hand had not been at work, manipulating miners’ away from the organized neatness of the National Union of Mineworkers (Num) and the tripartite alliance towards an illegal strike and a nefarious – but undefined – end.

Lonmin, Num, the ANC and government, despite being painfully absent in the days immediately after the massacre, still collectively managed to awaken the spectre of something uncertain, but counter-progressive, behind the deaths. Their panicked, heavy, silences, punctuated only by scrambled attempts to fend off Julius Malema’s presence, reassure markets or suggest that an un-named Svengali was at work.

According to grassroots activists the accusations of “criminality” and “third forces” are familiar: used to delegitimise and dismiss dissent and grievances – and perpetuate the notion of a society homogenously content with an ANC-led government.

Mnikelo Ndabankulu of the shack dweller movement Abahlali baseMjondolo noted police’s ramped up presence, arrests and intimidation at their marches compared to “Cosatu marches”.

Fighting for a living wage

“Treatment by the police is ten times worse than for someone like Satawu [the South African Transport and Allied Workers Union, a Cosatu affiliate] who go to the streets and destroy it and chase all the traders away,” said Ndabankulu.

Ayanda Kota, chairperson of the Unemployed People’s Movement, said these allegations “take the agency away from us. It’s the same argument used for the mineworkers fighting for a living wage: they are being used by some ‘third force’… Poor people…apparently can’t organize. It was the same with Steve Biko and the Black Consciousness Movement – the CIA were behind them.”

It is a depoliticisation of discontent that McGill University academic Jon Soske suggested in an online piece this week introduced a “new politics of grief” where “counterfeit mourning” and the packaging of “tragedy and condolences” by those in power “attempts to rob these deaths of any political meaning”.

Nigel Gibson, professor at Emerson College and author of Fanonian Practises in South Africa said: “Criminalization is absolutely essential to dividing a movement. It hamstrings it. But also it is an important tactic to dissipate support from outside, just as was done after the attacks on Kennedy Road [informal settlement in Durban, the former Abahlali headquarters]. Immediately the media focus – strategically promoted by the ANC of course – was to accuse Abahlali members for the murders and thereby not only criminalize the whole organization but create confusion among potential supporters in civil society. That the case was later thrown out of court and the accused acquitted is less important. The criminal label has already done its work.”

The 2009 attacks on Kennedy Road left two people dead and allegations continue to circulate that the ANC was involved in an attempt to eviscerate the uppity social movement.

Over-reaction

Richard Ballard, of the University of KwaZulu-Natal’s school of development studies, and co-editor of Voices of Protest: Social Movements in Post-Apartheid South Africa, noted in a chapter of a volume entitled Democratising Development that the ANC has a “somewhat hysterical response” to the various social movements that emerged post-1994 that “may initially be seen to be an over-reaction” in light of its large electoral majority.

“Yet they can be read as a shrewd attempt to monopolise the definition of legitimate expressions of citizenship,” continues Ballard.

This monopolistic impulse, combined with paternalism derived from an electoral majority and increasingly authoritarian tendencies by state security apparatus expressed itself most extremely in Marikana.

Rhodes University’s school of journalism’s Jane Duncan, said the violence could not “simply be attributed to the militarization of the police” but also reflected a global policing trend that “has moved away from a facilitative, rights-based approach to protest to something more authoritarian”.

The replacement of Public Order Policing units by police untrained in crowd control and leadership’s shoot first messaging where also contributing factors she added.

Academics like Ballard suggest that events like 2002’s World Summit for Sustainable Development, when civil society mobilized more numbers than the “official” ANC-organised march, thus “upstag[ing] it” were pivotal moments in the ANC’s response to dissenting voices. The ANC’s hold on popular mobilization and its mantle as the majority’s representative was threatened.

Mainstream press

This while ANC demagogues attacked the tripartite alliance’s “ultra-left” opposed to government’s Growth, Employment and Redevelopment macro-economic policy.

In 2002, SACP deputy secretary-general Jeremy Cronin was humiliated for warning against the “Zanufication” of the party. Cronin in an interview with Helena Sheehan talked of the conjuring of the “spectre of the [ultra]left”, a tendency with “quasi-treasonable” intent according Thabo Mbeki’s pitbulls.

The growing sense in civil society was if there was a clamp down on dissent within the tri-partite alliance, there was also less space outside it.

Duncan noted the emergence of dynamic social movements in the early 2000s twinned with “increasing abuse of activists [away from the barricades] that has been inadequately documented by the mainstream press.”

Random arrests and torture appear commonplace: Kota said UPM meetings were regularly disrupted by ANC members and that he was publically undressed and beaten in a police station earlier this year. Goaded by police for being the Grocott Mail’s ‘Newsmaker of the Year’.

When international eyes focus on South Africa, the response is insidious. At a civil society march on Cop17 in Durban last year, the Democratic Left Front’s Rehad Desai remembers municipality volunteers disrupting it.” Stones and blows were exchanged. One “volunteer” told the M&G they were there “to defend the president [Jacob Zuma]”.

From state intelligence infiltrating social movements to the murder of Marikana miners, there appears a greater intolerance towards dissent.

‘Third force’ fuelling W.Cape protests – MEC

http://www.eyewitnessnews.co.za/articleprog.aspx?id=51546

‘Third force’ fuelling W.Cape protests – MEC
Regan Thaw | 2010/10/26 12:06:06 PM

Western Cape Local Government MEC Anton Bredell on Tuesday said he believed a third force was fuelling service delivery protests in the Cape Town area.

Bredell added that mischievous elements were trying to discredit the Democratic Alliance-led provincial government ahead of next year’s municipal elections.

Recently, there has been a large amount of violent protest action in Khayelitsha and Nyanga.

Bredell said as the elections drsw closer, competition amongst councillors is heating up.

“We are in the silly season; it is eight months before elections, so obviously there are a lot of things going on in communities. Councillors are trying to reposition themselves and there are new people who want to get an innings,” he added.

He added that more sinister elements were also at play.

“There are definitely forces behind the scenes, motivating people to do protests,” he added.

(Edited By Lisa Bartlett)

The Third Force is Gathering its Strength

Abahlali baseMjondolo Press Statement
3 March 2010

The Third Force is Gathering its Strength

The goal that our attackers wanted to achieve when they ambushed us on the night of 26 September 2009 has not been achieved. A surprise attack was launched against our movement, the spontaneous resistance to the attack was broken by the police, our office was destroyed, hundreds of our members and supporters were chased from Kennedy Road, thirteen of our comrades were jailed and illegally detained and we have been banned from openly organising in the settlement where our movement was founded. But our movement was never just in Kennedy Road. Before the attack there were fifteen settlements affiliated to our movement in Durban and more than 50 branches across Durban, Pinetown, Tongaat, Howick, Pietermaritzburg and Cape Town. The goal of the attack was to destroy our movement to punish us for our victory against the Slums Act, to deny us the victory that we had won to have the Kennedy Road settlement upgraded where it is and to neutralise us before 2010. But our movement still exists. In fact it continues to grow. Since the attack we have launched four new branches and we will launch another four new branches soon. Continue reading

Sowetan: Invaders take over vacant council land

http://www.sowetan.co.za/News/Article.aspx?id=1100367Invaders take over vacant council land
Canaan Mdletshe
28 December 2009

Mayor says third force behind illegal invasion

UMTSHEZI municipality mayor Maliyakhe Shelembe has lambasted a massive Zimbabwe-style illegal land invasion in Estcourt in the KwaZulu-Natal Midlands on Christmas Day.

About 300 people arrived at vacant municipal land and erected shacks and makeshift structures in a move Shelembe said was spearheaded by a “third force hellbent on destabilising the municipality”.

The invaders marked “their plots”, put obstructions around them and started building shacks.

“We are using the Constitution and municipal by-laws to protect civilian and municipal property. The land they have illegally occupied has been set aside for low-cost housing development. Locals know that people who will get houses there are those who earn little or no income at all,” Shelembe said.

He said contrary to this, the people who have illegally occupied the land were driving fancy cars and some were teachers and did not qualify for low-cost houses.

He said the fact that some of the occupiers came from Gauteng, Richards Bay, Pietermaritzburg and Mpumalanga was an indication that there was a third force behind the move.

“The motives are clearly criminal. We view this as an attempt to destabilise the municipality and it is our duty to preserve and protect municipal property, which is why we will use every piece of legislation to defend that property. We have deployed the police to stop people from putting up structures,” he said.

One of the invaders Sowetan spoke to accused the government of ignoring their pleas for houses. He said he had been waiting for too long for a house and when he heard of the available plots he grabbed the opportunity.

“After waiting for nearly nine years it was time for action and when I heard that there were plots available, I thought to myself that God had finally answered my prayers ,” he said.

Landless People’s Movement national organiser Mangaliso Kubheka said though the “invaders” were not their members, they supported them.

“We support the move by these people because municipalities take the land and use it to build luxury homes for rich people ,” Kubheka said.

Shackdwellers ‘under the sway of an agent provocateur’

http://www.sundaytribune.co.za/index.php?fArticleId=3451568

Shackdwellers ‘under the sway of an agent provocateur’

September 24, 2006 Edition 1

Lennox Mabaso and Harry Mchunu

By their very nature agent provocateurs are people who are directly assigned to provoke unrest within a group while indirectly representing their own selfish interests.

They are used against political opponents. They deliberately carry out or seek to incite counter-productive or ineffective acts in order to foster public disdain.

They seek to provoke government repression with a hope that they will alienate their constituency and thus increase support for themselves. In this sense they thrive on provocation and not reason.  Continue reading