Category Archives: Katlego Moeng

Sowetan: Midvaal council ‘runs the courts’

http://www.sowetanlive.co.za/news/2011/05/05/midvaal-council-runs-the-courts

Midvaal council ‘runs the courts’

5-May-2011 | Katlego Moeng
Municipality also seems to be ‘running property business’

THE Midvaal municipality has been in the news over the past months after a series of evictions of property owners who have decried both the loss of their houses and land and the manner in which they were left without a roof over their heads.

Midvaal resident Sonti Maseko, who has lived in the area since 1992, witnessed her home being demolished in November last year.

Despite not having a place to stay, she has refused to leave and has instead chosen to pitch a tent next to the rubble that was once her home. Her husband John Zeefal and daughter Thandeka are with her.

Maseko’s home was demolished after a default judgment in the Vereeniging magistrate’s court.

As a result of her experience and the fact that she has been helping scores of other property owners in a similar predicament, the PAC has drafted her as candidate for the coming municipal elections.

This is Maseko’s story in her own words:

I have lived in a tent in Midvaal since November, including on Christmas and New Year. Now that it is winter we have as as a family altered our sleeping arrangements so as to protect my six-year-old child.

I have kept the tent there for a reason: to communicate to the Midvaal municipality and its agents that the piece of land is still and always will be mine and that I have not abandoned the fight to get it back. I have no other place to go to and no means of acquiring new land and property elsewhere.

The cold snap has not made things easy. To make my situation bearable I remind myself every day that the tent stands as a monument to my harrowing experience.

Many who have supported us through the hard months and have witnessed the whole saga and were themselves traumatised by the demolition of my house, spur us to fight on.

My story is simply this: I lost ownership of my property in 2004 after the municipality’s debt collectors, attorneys Odendaal and Summerton – Odendaal being the chairman of the DA in Midvaal – claimed I owed the council R2700.

For that, in a default judgement, they asked for my property to be declared especially executable, meaning the municipality was not interested in recovering the amount by attaching my car, household goods or anything else. My house was attached as a result.

I only became aware of this in June 2007 when I was notified that my house would be put up for auction in a month’s time.

Despite having a job and a salary that could easily clear the debt, the municipal attorneys said they would not accept my money and instead gave away my property to a third party, thereby forcing me into a lengthy and costly legal battle.

In July 2007, when my property was allegedly sold, I was informed by the very municipality, some two months earlier, that my property was valued at R245000 by municipal standards, which I am told are conservative estimates for tax purposes.

I have since been advised that my property, along the main road constituted prime land and would have been at least worth four times more in market rates as it had business rights. To me the property was just my home, a one-hectare happy space to make a home for my only child.

This was the second time they had gone after my property, having first tried in 1999 by selling it to a company owned by then councillor Steve du Toit and his son Henk for R550, ostensibly to recover a debt of about R1600. How was this possible? Was it legal?

This scenario is possible and has indeed come about because the Midvaal municipality practically runs the Meyerton magistrate’s courts.

The staff in that court routinely stamp piles of documents of default judgements against residents on a daily basis from council attorneys.

In our experience as residents of Midvaal, properties, once attached by the municipality, are sold “at auction”, where the buyers always seem to be the same people.

These individuals and entities then begin eviction processes at the Vereeniging magistrate’s courts, where the proceedings also leave much to be desired.

The property business being run from Midvaal and paid for by Africans is a very lucrative enterprise. This is particularly so when properties – land and house – being auctioned are disposed of for as little as R100 to the buyers, who can then resell them at market rates for a minimum of R300000.

So lucrative is this business that it has spin-offs that trickle down to even the security companies driving around the wards in bakkies advertising eviction and “counter land invasion” services.

Syndicate members have been known in many instances to sell one property to various parties at the same time, pocketing the money and just walking away.

In some cases black residents occupy properties they have paid for but have never been transferred to their names despite their having paid the transfer costs.

As a result they remain vulnerable to legal proceedings to evict them for arrears and for water.

The water charges and rates and taxes are Midvaal’s weapon of choice. It is not unheard of for residents to be charged exorbitant amounts, often as high as between R17000 and R30000.

When reporting to the attorneys to discuss their accounts and make arrangements, residents have reported being humiliated, with one elderly woman having had cigarette smoke blown in her face and told that she must get a boyfriend to help her pay her account.

Others have reported being told if they cannot afford to pay, then they must go and live in the neighbouring (black) townships where they can be “packed like sardines”.

Sowetan: Squatters sue council – Residents want service

http://www.sowetan.co.za/News/Article.aspx?id=1040670

Squatters sue council – Residents want service
Katlego Moeng
28 July 2009

Residents of Harry Gwala informal settlement near Wattville in Benoni have been battling the Ekurhuleni municipality in the South Gauteng high court since December last year to get services in their area.

“On December 12 last year the court ruled that the municipality must instal seven taps in the area and start collecting rubbish,” said Paseka Lihlabi, the chairperson of the Landless People’s Organisation in the settlement.

“But they only installed two taps and since giving us dustbins and a collection calendar just before the elections nothing has materialised.”

He said the community lost a bid to have electricity installed in the area in January at a hearing they were not allowed to attend.

“We have no electricity and Lihlabi said is totally dark at night.

“We have no proper toilets. This place is filthy because there is no rubbish removal. More than 500 households have to share two taps for water.

“Basically we have no services. We have to constantly fight for what government is supposed to be giving us.

“We have been fighting for so long that some people feel like throwing in the towel.

“The government is fighting against us in court.

“It is a shame that we, poor people, are being forced to take the government to court to get what we voted for.

“All these things that we are fighting for now are things they promised us to get our votes,”

Now Moray Hathorn, head of the pro bono practice group at law firm Webber Wentzel, is acting for the informal settlement in the Constitutional Court in a bid to help the community get basic sanitation.

The outcome of the case might set a nationwide precedent about the right to basic sanitation for people living in informal settlements.

Hathorn said proper sanitation was even more important than personal hygiene and water quality in the prevention of gastric illnesses and other diseases.

In other rural settlements in South Africa where sanitation has been provided, anecdotal evidence suggests there has been a dramatic improvement in the health of those in the area as the incidence of gastric illnesses and skin ailments drop.

On Tuesday last week, residents of Thokoza’s Mkhathili informal settlement and nearby hostels on Khumalo Street took to the streets in violent protests against inadequate services.

They said they were tired of waiting for services , vowing to continue with the protests until their grievances are addressed.

Ekurhuleni mayor Ntombi Mekgwe yesterday said the municipality had financial constraints and the courts should bear that in mind in its rulings.

Sowetan: Shack dwellers told to get ‘out’

Shack dwellers told to get ‘out’

08 August 2008
Katlego Moeng

A Soweto man who applied for a RDP house in 1996 is now being threatened with eviction from his shack in Soweto’s Doornkop informal settlement.

Moses Sibeko, 37, has repeatedly renewed his RDP application and is also registered on the housing department’s demand database.

On Friday, the word “OUT” was painted on Sibeko’s shack. He was not at home and officials from the local municipal office told his wife that they must leave within two months.

The couple have four children. The eldest is aged eight.

Sibeko said: “This is happening because some of us refused to pay bribes to Mavis Sebeko, the woman in charge.”

Local councillor, Joyce Rakgetla, confirmed that Sebeko is in charge of administration at the Doornkop office, but said she does not know anything about Sebeko soliciting bribes.

Sowetan visited Doornkop yesterday to hear residents’ grievances.

Anna Mfulo, 70, who struggles to walk, is Sibeko’s neighbour. Her shack also has the words “OUT” written on it. She has been living there for 16 years with her daughter, who died recently.

“That woman [Sebeko] does not care. She is rude and aggressive. She was here last week harassing us, saying she wants us gone.

“Where must I go?” asked a despondent Mfulo.

Sifiso Buthelezi, 31, and Eliah Letele, 35, also told similar stories of harassment and intimidation. They both have documents showing they have upgraded their status on the department’s demand database.

“Despite this, Sebeko told us that we must leave.

“She does not explain anything, only says that she has the power,” said the men.

Attempts to get comment from Sebeko were unsuccessful.