Category Archives: Heinz de Boer

Sunday Tribune: Development plan sparks outrage

Another (partial) victory….

Development plan sparks outrage

http://www.sundaytribune.co.za/?fSectionId=&fArticleId=vn20081205110201169C507038

5 December 2008, 12:52
By Heinz de Boer

There were howls of protest when the eThekwini Municipality resolved
that it would compel landowners to allow the city to provide toilets and
water to squatters who invade plots of land.

The decision on who will ultimately foot the bill has not been
finalised, although each case will be decided on individually.

It was one of the smallest, yet controversial items on the agenda on
Thursday at the last full council meeting in 2008.

The recommendation was pushed through with the support of all political
parties besides the DA.

Tabled as a “response to the lack of sanitation facilities in informal
settlements located on private land”, the adoption of the item has paved
the way for Water and Sanitation head Neil Macleod to serve notice on
“errant” landowners who do not comply with the council resolution.

Residents who turn a blind eye to the notices could expect municipal
engineers to step in and provide the essential services at a cost to the
general rate paying public.

Councillors had earlier approved a R175-million budget, to be spent over
the next two years, to provide temporary toilet facilities and sewer
connection for 318 informal settlements.

Municipal plans to force the general public to pay for squatters could
however be compared to a “land grab”, the DA said.

An attempt to have the recommendation altered to give homeowners the
option to refuse water and sanitation services to be installed on their
property was outvoted by the ANC and its allies.

“There are people who cannot afford to fence their land; and they don’t
wish to have these informal settlements on their land.

“By going in and putting in these facilities it amounts to a land grab.
People should be afforded the right to say, ‘not on my land’,” DA
councillor Gillian Noyce said.

But ANC Councillor Sipho Khuzwayo said all landowners were not victims
of squatting, with some actively encouraging the formation of informal
settlements on their land to turn a quick buck.

“We find that the landowners are benefiting from the people because they
charge rent. So they must be forced to provide them with sanitation
facilities because they benefit financially.

“The DA was suggesting a reference back (to have the item discussed at
executive or committee level before being voted on at full council),
because there are no white people in informal settlements,” Khuzwayo
said.

Daily News: ‘No one can have it if we can’t’

Note how this article conflates community connections and copper cable theft – two completely different things….and how threats from above are normalized while a threat from below, with a clearly spelled out logic, is ‘bizarre’…

http://www.dailynews.co.za/?fSectionId=&fArticleId=vn20080820111834480C857906

‘No one can have it if we can’t’
20 August 2008, 12:14

By Heinz de Boer

“If you remove our cables, you had better move all the power from the area. No-one can have it if we are not allowed to (have electricity).”

This is part of a bizarre threat made to the city after vandals destroyed a mini substation and totally blacked out a large part of Sea Cow Lake from Friday. The electricity supply was restored on Tuesday.

A note was left behind holding the city to ransom and threatening more of the same if the city clamped down on illegal connections and cable theft.

Durban Electricity deputy head Roy Wienand on Tuesday confirmed a major act of sabotage in the Sea Cow Lake region, saying vandals blacked out a large area after tampering with the equipment.

Although the financial implications of the sabotage are still being calculated, a single mini substation is conservatively valued at R100 000.

Wienand said the note threatened that the same would happen if the council did not allow illegal connections to remain. He said theft would, however, continue until the socio-economic conditions behind the thefts were eradicated.

“There is generally rampant theft of electricity and illegal connections in the Sea Cow Lake area. As fast as we replace these cables they are stolen again. But unless we police 24 hours a day it will happen. Wherever there are informal settlements where poor people have not been provided with electricity the temptation to connect illegally is often too great for some,” he said.

Then there are the professional thieves who have made the wholesale theft of major electrical lines their business. Armed with chainsaws, the gangs often target rural or desolate areas where cables run.

Several private security cars were on standby at the Sea Cow Lake site on Tuesday morning as Durban Electricity workers and private contractors replaced cables and switching gear. It is understood that two transformers also had to be replaced.

The incident is only one in the bigger picture of copper cable and electricity theft, which is costing ratepayers millions each year. Wienand confirmed that about 2 percent or R30-million of all electricity bought from Eskom is stolen annually.

This figure doubles when labour costs and equipment is factored in.

Recently thieves caused a pylon at Isipingo to collapse after the mounting bolts on its four legs were removed. Three men were arrested after the incident.

The city had to fork out R2-million for the new overhead pylon. The cost to businesses in the South Durban region from this incident alone has been estimated at between R50-million and R100-million.

Durban is now looking at forming an elite anti-theft unit, following the example of the Cape “Copper Heads”.

“Ultimately, the only way to solve electricity theft is to provide everyone with power in their homes. But we are improving our patrols and will definitely not sit on our hands and do nothing. But unfortunately as Cape Town has success with these gangs, they will move up the coast, and as we have success they will move to other areas. Arrests are the only way of stopping it. We will definitely curb it,” Wienand said.

Members of the public who spot suspicious contractors or people tampering with lines can call 031 311 9611.

* This article was originally published on page 1 of The Daily News on August 20, 2008

Daily News: No rat poison for informal settlements

slowly, slowly the city is realising that it has to work with shack dwellers’ organisations rather than the councillors that work for the local rich and want shack dwellers forcibly removed from their areas. slowly, slowly the city is starting to begin to learn to work with and not for. but still no comment from abm in the article. still talking about, not too…and will the new clean up campaigns require the poor to do the work – another burden on poor women, another subsidy for society carried by the poorest?

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=124&art_id=vn20080728110911487C877196

No rat poison for informal settlements

By Heinz de Boer

Rat poison will not be distributed to people living in informal settlements, but major clean-ups are being planned across the municipality.

That’s according to head of the council’s communicable disease control unit, Dr Ayo Olowolagba, who on Sunday dispelled fears that rat poison would be given to people living in informal settlements.

Olowolagba was responding to an earlier municipal press release in which the health department claimed it would distribute poison to communities.

Rat infestations came under the spotlight last week after reports that a toddler had been bitten by one of the rodents in the Kennedy Road informal settlement, which was largely destroyed in a fire last week. The rats had bitten the two-month-old’s fingers.

Olowolagba further dismissed claims that his department was working against the Shack Dwellers Movement, Abahlali baseMjondolo.

He said his department had met with the group this week and were working with them to help jump-start several clean-ups.

Litter, old cars and other rubble remains the root of Durban’s widespread rat problem, Olowolagba said.

“There needs to be proper management of waste.

“There have been mass campaigns where there are big clean-ups and mass poisoning. But this is only once the groundwork has been done,” he said.

o This article was originally published on page 6 of Daily News on July 28, 2008

Daily News: Fracas at temporary camp after evictions

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?art_id=vn20071113094833488C531147&set_id=1&click_id=124&sf=
http://www.internafrica.org/

November 13 2007 at 04:35PM

By Heinz de Boer

Grime-streaked toddlers run past a forlorn “no dumping” sign as other members of their tent community try to bring some semblance of normality to daily life.

Yet a long road lies ahead before any normality will return for the 98 families which have been dumped at a dusty piece of council land in Joyce Road, and who are now at the centre of a political and social spat that could have major ramifications for the city.

While irate Sea Cow Lake residents and local councillor Preeth Ramchuran are preparing to lock horns over the displaced people at a ratepayers’ association meeting tonight (Tuesday), the more than 300 people who now live under council provided tents are hatching desperate plans to find alternate housing.

Evicted from a piece of private property within the Peter Road informal settlement last Tuesday, the residents marched to a local municipal office where they demanded action from the council.

Faced with a “humanitarian crisis”, Ramchuran suggested that the city erect a series of tents on a vacant piece of land just across the N2 in Joyce Road.

His decision and subsequent backing from city manager Dr Michael Sutcliffe has sparked outrage from the Democratic Alliance and Bakerville Ratepayers’ Association, who have warned that the city is setting a dangerous precedent.

DA chief whip Colin Gaillard lamented the fact that Sutcliffe and Ramchuran had authorised the tented community to be erected, while association chairperson Robin Lalla lashed out at council for allowing people to live in squalid conditions.

Set on a tiny piece of land near the busy freeway, the site has no water or electricity connections, while children play among the broken furniture and wooden stacking palates that lie scattered among the tents.

According to resident Bernard Makhoba, the situation has reached critical proportions.

“We had been living on that land for 17 years when they came and bulldozed us. My uncle was in a shack that caught alight and died, but no one wants to listen to us. The children are now getting sick; we have no water, and many people believe they were living better when they were in shacks,” Makhoba said.

While conscious of the humanitarian implications, Gaillard said council was treading on dangerous ground by intervening in what was essentially a private land eviction.

“One would understand if the council was going to develop this site for housing, but where do we now draw the line? What the people are living in now is even worse than shacks.

The council should have rather used its muscle to assist the people to stay the eviction than create another informal settlement,” Gaillard said.

Ramchuran, however, said efforts to stay the eviction were fruitless, and confirmed that he was helping residents launch an appeal against the eviction.

“On the one hand the residents don’t want the shack dwellers there. But this is a temporary situation which I believe is better than having them just gate-crash anywhere in the area,” Ramchuran said.

Sutcliffe said the situation would definitely not be permanent.

“We are trying to deal with a difficult situation in the most practical way,” he said.

o This article was originally published on page 5 of Daily News on November 13, 2007

Daily News: Shack dwellers to camp

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=124&art_id=vn20070710100901378C608216

July 10 2007

Council has in an 11th-hour move agreed to provide tented accommodation for the people it left without homes after a raid by the Land Invasion Unit (LIU).

Informal residents of the controversial Crossmoore settlement in Chatsworth applied for an urgent High Court Interdict last Friday to compel the council to provide them with shelter.

This after the LIU moved on to the property and again demolished the shanty homes of at least 40 families on Thursday, amid claims that some councillors were inciting people to illegally occupy the land.

Director of the Legal Resource Centre, Mahendra Chetty, who was approached by the residents, said the formal court application would be withdrawn from court on Tuesday morning.

In return, attorneys representing council in negotiations on Monday agreed that the municipality would provide tents to those who had their shacks demolished.

The Crossmoore settlement has been at the centre of controversy since about 20 families defied council and built shacks on the vacant land a year ago. The SAPS and LIU have since clashed with residents during many land clearance operations.

The demolitions have also attracted the attention of the Diakonia Council of Churches, which condemned the clearance operations.

On Monday, the Diakonia said it had evidence of “flagrant carelessness for the basic human rights of the individuals and families concerned as well as the due processes of law”.

“The Diakonia Council of Churches urges those responsible to act hastily to remedy their actions and calls on the surrounding communities to respond to this situation.”